3/28/2023 0 Comments Helicon focus pro kaufen![]() ![]() The two most important things that Helicon gives us over Photoshop are speed and accuracy the 2nd being especially important. I’ve had the same experience as Vadim except I have attempted, and waited for Photoshop to stack images, only to be disappointed with the results produced. Sure, there are lots of other added elements, some which I’ll cover, but it’s the way that Helicon renders your stacked images that makes it so much better than Photoshop.Īs you can see from the video, Helicon is much faster than Photoshop and produces some very good results, once you get the right settings dialed in. These rendering methods are the most important part of the program. He made this great video which takes you through the three main rendering methods of Helicon Focus. Vadim Chiline of Epic Mind Studio is one of the instructors over at Photigy a website dedicated to product photography education. For you, hopefully, this little review will help you decide. For me, the answer was an unequivocal yes. With that in mind, it’s no surprise that it produces results superior to Photoshop, but the big question is “is it worth it?”. Helicon Focus is a program dedicated to focus stacking. That’s where Helicon Focus came to my rescue. In my personal experience shooting product photos, Photoshop could not produce results I was happy with. Our very own Matthew Saville made this excellent video which shows you exactly how to focus stack within Photoshop. It is a viable option though and one which many photographers use. Yes, you can focus stack in Photoshop, but it’s slow, sometimes painfully so, and, more importantly, the results are not always perfect. Some of you may be jumping out of your seats at this point saying, “I can do this in Photoshop! I don’t need another program!” You would be both right and wrong. For others, it’s an absolute necessity that every little detail is sharp, for instance, product photography. For some, it’s a stylistic choice just like any other photographic technique. This is where focus stacking comes into play. If, however, we would like everything to be in focus – a flower in the foreground to a building in the background, an object filling our frame, and so on – things become a little more difficult. If we want very little in focus, most of us know how to accomplish this. That depth of field may cover anything from meters to millimeters. Your camera, lens, distance to subject and aperture will produce a particular depth of field. Zerene Stacker goes the other route, exposing the conversion process and encouraging users to deal with it as what we think it really is: a key part of the overall workflow that deserves some attention in order to get best results.What Is Focus Stacking And Why Should I Use It?įor those that don’t have the time to read my previous article, I will give you a quick rundown. Some stacking software from other companies deals with this aspect by accepting raw files at the level of the user interface, then converting them to some RGB format, typically TIFF, in a background process that is easy to overlook and may be difficult to optimize. The structure of data in a typical raw image file, one value per photosite with color implied by a mosaic Bayer filter pattern, is fundamentally incompatible with the image alignment process that is required for stacking. See Working with Lightroom for more details about this "Pro-only" feature.Ī longer explanation is that no stacking software really works directly with raw files. ![]() When using Lightroom with the plugin, processing raw files is just a matter of selecting them and doing an Export to Zerene Stacker. If you use Lightroom, then be aware that there's a Lightroom plugin for Zerene Stacker that handles raw conversion automatically. You can download those separately, or use software provided by your camera manufacturer. Zerene Systems does not provide raw converters. After stacking the 16-bit TIFFs, tell Zerene Stacker to save its output also as 16-bit TIFF.īecause 16-bit TIFF files are lossless and have more bits per pixel than are captured by current cameras, this process retains all of the image quality intrinsic to the raw formats. First you convert the raw files to some standard RGB format, typically TIFF, and then you stack the TIFF files.įor highest quality, we recommend converting raw files to 16-bit TIFF using your favorite raw converter and whatever settings make it work the best. To process any format of raw files, including DNG, takes two separate steps. The long answer to your question shown below is from their website's FAQ. It depends on what you mean by the term, support. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |